A POSSIBLE YOUNG UNIVERSE?
THE BIG BANG
If you forget all else I
write here REMEMBER THIS ONE THING - the big bang
contradicts Genesis!
On my main web page, I begin
with the order of the days of creation. (see my page)
The latest revision of the
big bang theory says stars evolved first (not created) by clumping together
hydrogen & helium. And this process occurred for millions of yrs because
they were extremely massive in those days. (I originally heard it was billions
of years but that could have been secondary or tertiary scientific literature.)
Then, because of their size, they supernovaed which
created (can they use that word??) 'refuse' elements (all
other elements known – see my link
to my copy of periodic table and note its extreme complexity that came simply
from an explosion!) These refuse elements then magically clumped together to
form stellar systems & any planets. The bible says earth first (Gen 1:1),
THEN the sun & stars. Another note is that the plants were made BEFORE the
sun was formed. How could they live millions of yrs (like day-age people
believe) without the sun?!?! They just accept peoples word and don't read THE WORD.
Also, note how the periodic
table has elements that donate/receive 1 electron, 2 electrons, 3, etc. This is
order! This is complexity! Did virus programs just evolve by themselves?? No!
They had a maker (designer) who was more complex than what they had made.
ASKING QUESTIONS
Albert Einstein stated: an important thing is to not stop asking
questions. Whether it is a religious
belief or a scientific postulate or theory – ASK QUESTIONS!
What is the scientific (or
scriptural) proof? Does it contradict known laws of science? Is it observable
and repeatable in an experiment?
A good scientist
revisits his theories and reassesses. Continual testing and evaluating.
Bad science will
patch one hole after another on his aged sinking boat (Darwinian time theories)
at the cost of good science practices!
When the patches are almost as prevalent as the boat itself, it’s time
to abandon ship!!!
You see, the details are
going to either prove or disprove an argument.
Many assumptions are being made by various theories.
Let’s look at some details of
THE BIG BANG. Why doesn’t any scientist
ever mention:
1. Where the
big ball of hydrogen and helium came from (because they’d have to answer
"God made it.") Some have said, it was just there.
(Duh!)
2. What
suddenly made this ball of matter explode?
3. Angular
rotation of ALL galaxies couldn’t come from an explosion – if any at all. It
would make velocities radial along a line.
Everything we observe rotates! From the electron around the atom, planets rotate on their
axes, moons around planets, our planets around our sun, our solar system around
our galaxy, our galaxy upon its axis. From small to big.
4. RED SHIFT - Most have not
heard, but the red shift does have another interpretation! Not just a small percent, a 50/50 chance!
They are EITHER moving away from us OR rotating. Spinning/rotating stars will
give the same red shift like any object receding from one self. Since we see
all objects in heaven rotating, maybe this is the better solution to red
shifting star light - not result of the Big Bang everything shooting away from a common point. Now,
we do know that light has traveled for great distances. But recent earth based
experiments (I saw on a Nova show) indicate that light can accelerate to a few
hundred times faster than its 'known' fastest speed when it is in a medium (not
a vacuum). So if it can be accelerated, then, it may have had a perfect speed
the day stars were created. Or, simply, God caused it to shine on the earth so
we can bask in more glory from His hands! (which
sounds like what the scriptures indicate anyway!)
5. There is
also a BIG BANG FUDGE
FACTOR stating that at 10 ^ –35 sec after THE BIG BANG, the speed of light
SUDDENLY was exceeded in free space by all known matter (hydrogen & helium
shards) with only itself existing in the universe. Quite a feat! At an astronomy conference in fall 2003, a
NASA physicist explained this and later told me this is where "the laws of
physics do not apply." How convenient. If there’s a hole in your boat,
just state water pressure laws do not apply and it will not supplant the air
within the boat! I think this theory sinks! OH, it gets better. In the same way
this magical unexplainable force suddenly accelerated all known matter to
surpass the speed of light, at 10 ^-28 seconds (if I remember correctly)
suddenly and unexplainably in free space, all known matter slowed down again to
the present velocities of what the galaxies & quasars hold today. This
breaking of the law of physics puts galaxies in the universe at the proper
spatial distance most astronomers presently agree on. WHY NOT JUST BELIEVE GOD DID WHAT HE SAID HE DID IN GENESIS
CHAPTER1: He caused the light to shine on the earth (paraphrase)? IT TAKES MORE FAITH
TO BELIEVE EVOLUTION THAN GOD’S WORD!
Who do you believe? Changing
science? Or, God’s Word, written 2 to 3+
THOUSAND years ago that we’re still pulling truth from!
HERE’S SOME
EXAMPLES OF CHANGING SCIENCE & MEDIA SCIENCE ‘MISTAKES’:
We are told today, the earth
is 4.5 billion years old. In the 1960’s
we were taught the earth was 1 or 2 billion years old. In
Remember, secondary
literature (news papers, magazines & their web sites), though they may have
scientists on staff, it’s the non-technical editors who mistakenly (and I would
hope not purposely) pass these errors. This is common with news media-science. (CLICK HERE TO SEE CNN SPEED OF
LIGHT BLOOPER). Secondary
literature is also distributed & readily available to more readers due to
the low usage of non-technical terms.
This aids in perpetuating incorrect science.
Ah, speed of
light, speed of sound, what’s the difference anyway?
At normal atmospheric
pressure and a temperature of 20 degrees Celsius, a sound wave will travel at
approximately 750 miles/hour (abt 0.21 miles/second). The speed of a sound wave is
slow in comparison to the speed of a light wave. Light travels through
air at a speed of approximately 300,000 meters/second; this is nearly 900 times the speed of sound. Quite an error,
don’t you think? [NOTE: I originally cut the statistics from “the physics
classroom” online (a site I can no longer find) who stated light was 900,000
times the speed of sound, which, on second look, I noticed wasn’t right. So I did my own calculations & put the
correction above. Sorry! WOW, can’t even trust a physics web site to
be right all the time!!! This just goes
to prove again – YOU CAN’T BLANKETLY TRUST THINGS ABT SCIENCE! ASK QUESTIONS!]
On January 29,
2003 I also contacted CNN about another blooper they aired about mixing up the
speed of light and sound while addressing the space shuttle Columbia disaster.
I used their web site to send them a message and they quickly pulled the
scientifically erroneous picture and just read their story instead.
Take what you hear from the
news media with a grain of salt. Then
investigate yourself! KEEP ASKING QUESTIONS!
EVOLUTION OF
OUR SOLAR SYSTEM & URANUS AND
If the whole solar system
came from one ball of matter, how can the sun (with 99% of the mass) only have
2% of the angular momentum of the solar system?? Laws of physics prove the
largest body (the sun) would have the largest momentum. But why do our planets
have most of the momentum? All these truths strike venom at evolution that says
our solar system was once a big blob that slooowly
cooled and turned into planets & a star.
Why does Uranus spin on its
axis backwards?
If the whole solar system
came from one ball of matter, there is no good explanation for this! If the one
big ball of matter turned into a sun with smaller balls of matter, all the
subsets will have parallel paths (angular momentum) and won’t intersect. But the best they got is this:
Neither is there any
explanation as to what made
LET’S USE SOME
MORE CRITICAL THINKING:
What physics book have you
studied to look at a 2 body, three-dimensional collision and the resultant 2
bodies remain in almost exactly the same plane of origin (our earth’s and other
planets’ planes relative to the sun)? Additionally,
Note - 3 of our planets:
Venus, Uranus, & Pluto have their axis rotation reversed to their normal
motion through space (called retrograde rotation). In layman’s terms, if you spin a top, [and
I’ve spun many as a child] looking from above, say it spins to the right –
we’ll call this spinning on its axis.
You will notice it begins to make larger circles TO THE RIGHT – we’ll
call this orbit around the sun. What you will NOT see is it making larger
circles to the LEFT. But that is exactly
what you see these 3 planets doing – rotating on their axis the opposite of
their orbit. This creates more problems to the laws of physics – so it is
investigated, tested and re-theorized? NO!
It is IGNORED! The solar system DID NOT come from one blob of matter (called nebular
theory) that slooooly cooled, etc. Physics & the Big Bang are opponents!
EARTH-MOON RELATIONSHIP
The earth & moon’s age is
said to be 4.5 bill yrs old, yet if you reverse the moon's recession from the
earth, it hits the earth at abt 1 bill yrs only! The
moon's rate of recession is a very reliable constant (presently abt 2"/yr). And the effects of the moon supposedly
breaking away from the earth even until a great distance away from the earth
would be cataclysmic! It would cause immense tides and earth crust shears,
volcanic eruptions with mountain changes - not a very habitable habitat! So,
nothing could live back then
CRITICAL THINKING – what caused the supposed hot blob of matter that
will become the moon to break away from the hot blob of matter that will become
the earth? It would have had to be hot otherwise there’d be sharp jagged edges
of both from where they were adjoined. In the world of physics, this is even
more ridiculous than
So what if the blob that
became the moon and the blob that became the earth congealed next to each
other? Then there’d be no jagged edges but what would be the chance of these
separate 2 objects having the same angular momentum? Improbable!
None of these 2 possibilities
are very feasible, much less, the evolutionary theory of the moon breaking away
from the earth. When you really look at it, there is NO explanation of the
origin of the moon – naturally. The only real explanation is God made it!
SATURN
Saturn has 2 moons that
exchange orbits every 2-3 year cycles. Why didn't this kinetic energy dissipate
over millions of yrs?? Because it isn’t that old.
And remember the results of
our Saturn satellite Cassini – Saturn’s rings were made out of sharp pointed
ice/rock! After millions of yrs, this should all be rounded. No wonder they are
puzzled, they still are wearing their evolutionary
sunglasses. Those things will blind you! They block good scientific
observations and filter out truth!
JUPITER
Jupiter's first moon, Io, has
multiple volcanic eruptions. Dr. Van Till had a 2 day seminar March 16 & 17
2000 at
You can contort the surface
and generate some heat from the energy in the surface, but this will not sustain
the molten core which is what is erupting from the volcanoes.
COMETS
There is no valid explanation
for why comets still exist after millions of yrs. Comets burn out as they keep
going. That is the tail – the material jettisoned from it as the ice boils from
its approach to the sun. The supposed Oort cloud
(comet nursery that shoots one out every now & then) that is beyond Pluto has two camps of thought: one says it is in one direction
from our sun; the other is in a very different direction. (based
on Nova program). No one has seen this cloud either. There are only theories
about it based on unsure evidences.
Now the funny thing, is,
since the discovery of a 10th planet, far beyond Pluto, there still
is no evidence of a comet nursery.
Neither does anyone explain, first, the mechanism that kicks the comet
out of the nursery (like it’s growing comets!) and, second, how the comet gets
a rotational path around our sun instead of just cutting through our solar
system. NO evidence for the Oort cloud and the physics of the whole comet trajectory is
bad! Just another PATCH on the
evolutionary web of deception to keep people believing in the faith of
evolution!
SOME OF EARTH’S ‘CLOCKS’
Earth's electromagnetic field
is decreasing with each year. since we've been
measuring it (abt 150 yrs) it has decreased at the
rate of one half every 1400 yrs! If you reverse this rate of decrease, the
Earth's magnetic field's 'original' strength was (if it were millions of years
old) would be the size of either the sun or Jupiter!!! Remember, one thousand
Earths can fill Jupiter, one thousand Jupiters can fill up the sun. Whichever one it is, it would be enormous and
the effects of this powerful magnetic field on any living organism on the earth
under those conditions would be hazardous (life wouldn’t evolve!) The bearable field strength fits to under 14,000 years.
Sorry cave men, mammoths & dinosaurs, too hazardous for you to live!
The ocean’s saltiness
increases as time goes forward due to sediment runoff. If the earth were
millions or more yrs old, it would be too salty to either support little life,
or support no life (like the
Radioactive elements original
quantities have decreased over time. No debate there. But over millions of
years, there would be so much radioactive material on the Earth that living
things would suffer from radiation poisoning!!! Forget about that amoeba or
that fish crawling out of the slime pond! He would have died before he even
magically got more genetic information to become an advanced creature.
PULSARS
There are not enough pulsars
(neutron stars) in the universe for it to be millions (and much less billions) of years old. There are only a few
hundred. And scientists are puzzled that
there are not numerous amounts.
OTHER POINTS
Are new stars being 'born' ?? ALL observable
science shows matter decaying - not organizing. So, no new stars are being
born. We may just have started seeing the
light (pun intended.)
Will we see the asteroid belt
turn into a planet? Eventually? NEVER! (technically there is barely enough material even for a small
planet.) Let me reiterate: ALL OBSERVABLE SCIENCE
shows matter decaying - not organizing.
STARS’
PURPOSE
(Gen
1:14-15)
1. to separate day from night
2. for signs
3. for seasons, days & years (count passing time)
4. to give light on the earth
Why would God create
something for us not to marvel at? Of course, we can't see all of God's marvels
at once (close stellar objects, distant stellar objects) because we wouldn't appreciate
nor even perceive (with our limited minds) the vast complexity of what we
behold. A parallel of equal magnitude is the inward depth of complexity in
cells and atoms.
HOW OLD WAS ADAM WHEN HE WAS CREATED?
When did the first fruit
trees produce fruit for Adam & Eve to eat? How long did they have to wait
for food to ripen??
This is called "apparent
age." Adam & Eve could walk & talk and pick fruit from trees. They
were not toddlers! But they were 1 day old! The same applies with the universe!
Stars seem far away, but, how long did it take for the light to reach earth??
God could have certainly made it shine on earth. (as
stated above.)
If life came from other
planets, where did that life come from??? This is just putting off the argument
WAY WAY back in the past so you forget abt it. So have you asked this question? If not, you fell
for Satan’s lie too!
